The discussion is particularly inane, especially considering Syracuse's victory last evening essentially served as the program's most important victory in just under 12 months.
However, given the discussion's vigorous debate over the last 24 hours, it is probably worthwhile to provide a definitive opinion on the matter.
Issue
Whether Otto's Army rightfully "stormed the court" following Syracuse's beatdown of Georgetown.
Ruling
Absolutely not.
Rationale
This notebook has previously weighed in on the debate of proper "court storming" technique. As Syracuse had already secured victory prior to the final two minutes of regulation, the "court storming" was clearly in violation of Section 1(b) of Matt Glaude's Law of Stupid Things Associated With Collegiate Athletics.
The ruling in this matter is without appeal.
However, given the discussion's vigorous debate over the last 24 hours, it is probably worthwhile to provide a definitive opinion on the matter.
Whether Otto's Army rightfully "stormed the court" following Syracuse's beatdown of Georgetown.
Absolutely not.
This notebook has previously weighed in on the debate of proper "court storming" technique. As Syracuse had already secured victory prior to the final two minutes of regulation, the "court storming" was clearly in violation of Section 1(b) of Matt Glaude's Law of Stupid Things Associated With Collegiate Athletics.
The ruling in this matter is without appeal.
Labels: Basketball, Big East
0 Responses to “The Great Debate”
Post a Comment