Countdown to Football Frustration

Next Frustrating Hoops Victory

Next Lacrosse Annihilation

Bonanza of Numbers: Part II

[The Parity Index]
The Parity Index is a simple measure of how close each conference is to "utopian" competitive balance. Thus, if every team in a conference finished with a .500 conference record, the conference's parity index value would be zero (0).

Why is this important?

Well, through an examination of parity, several valuable insights may be made, including:
- What conferences are most prone to parity thus making each conference game all that more important;
- Perspective can be given to "upsets" by placing them in the context of the conference they occur in; and
- Insights may be made as to relationship between parity and the intangibles associated with each D-1A football conference.

And if you're interested, the 2004 Parity Index may be found here.

Parity Index - 2005
ConferenceParity Index
Western Athletic30.619
Big East28.571
PAC Ten28.504
Big Ten27.178
Southeastern27.003
Big Twelve23.936
Mountain West23.570
Mid-American22.823
Conference USA21.651
Atlantic Coast21.651
Sun Belt17.496

[Analysis]
Atlantic Coast Conference
All season the ACC was characterized as the most competitive conference in the country. With nine of the conferences twelve teams within one victory or defeat from a .500 record, the ACC was clearly the most competitively balanced conference in the country in 2005.

PAC-10
The PAC-10 once again places amongst the worst three conferences in the country in terms of competitive balance. Unless you're interested in watching the daily line being validated, there is little reason to tune into any of these contests.

Sun Belt
Here's some simple math that adequately describes the Sun Belt's high parity value:

A Bunch of Shitty Teams + Very Few Dominating Road Variables = High Parity.

Big East
What a difference a year makes.

In 2004, the Big East was the second-most competitive conference in the country chiming in with a 21.822 parity value. This year, the Big East saw itself become one of the least competitively balanced conferences in the country.

Why did this happen? It's actually pretty simple: the addition of Louisville and Syracuse's sharp demise.

1 Responses to “Bonanza of Numbers: Part II”

  1. # Anonymous accommodation australia rental western

    Hi Blogger, I found your blog quite informative.
    I just came across your blog and wanted to
    drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with it.
    I give you my best wishes for your future endeavors.
    If you have a moment, please visit my accommodation australia rental western site.
    Have a great week!  

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

Search

  • Air Your Grievances

  • syracuseorange44@gmail.com
  • This About Sums It Up

  • I am less smart for having read your blog.
  • - Anonymous Georgetown supporter.
  • You are an idiot...
  • - Anonymous Nunes/Magician Reader.
  • Congrats on not being very good at what you do.
  • - Anonymous ACC supporter.
  • You are a dweeb, my friend. Grow a backbone.
  • - Anonymous UConn supporter.
  • ...vacuous, asinine, and mind numbing...
  • - Anonymous commenter.
  • Honestly, just admit that you are pathetic...
  • - Anonymous commenter.
  • You just don't have hoops experience.
  • - Twitter commenter.
  • Leave the journalism to talented people. Brian is just another hack and another fair weather fan.
  • - Twitter commenter.
  • A bad blog about Syracuse athletics.
  • - UConn Fan on Twitter (after winning NCAA).






XML